不知道這個(gè)片有多少是藝術(shù)改編，幾個(gè)覺得不符合邏輯的地方：
1.臨時(shí)外交據(jù)點(diǎn)沒有大使館的常備安全設(shè)施，大使就敢優(yōu)哉游哉地度假一樣在戰(zhàn)亂國家呆上好幾天？
2.放火之前國務(wù)院特工和大使在衛(wèi)生間不會(huì)用明晃晃掛在墻上的毛巾堵堵門縫，捂住口鼻？安全屋啥也沒有，沒有防毒面具，這也又回到問題1了。
3.后來開車沒頭蒼蠅一樣撞到敵軍地盤的國務(wù)院特工不是專業(yè)的嗎？？怎么這么不堪大任呢？！左右不分也就罷了，對(duì)方讓他們靠邊停車下來盤問的時(shí)候，形勢(shì)已經(jīng)如此明顯，居然還在車?yán)锬E

這次事件為何被稱為希拉里郵件門，轉(zhuǎn)一篇文章：
Did Hillary’s Email Get Ambassador Stevens Killed?
[img=1:C][/img]
The last Hillary Clinton email dump includes one that gives away the location of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was murdered by terrorists in Benghazi. Is she responsible for his death?
The email was sent in 2011 and is one of several State Department emails that went through Clinton’s personal email account and private, non-secure server virtually advertising Stevens’ whereabouts, Breitbart reports. Others that had been previously released revealed that Stevens was moving “from Malta to Benghazi,” advised that he and his “team are in the hotel” and disclosed that he had requested “better security at the hotel” and “better security-related coordination.”

《危機(jī)13小時(shí)》對(duì)政治、軍事介入的反思
轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明網(wǎng)址: http://www.weigoucun.com/archives/id-705.html